17 Jan 2016 03:18:59
Russell and Clarkson are just like Curry and Ellis and in my opinion I think we should trade Clarkson and keep Russell. Trade Clarkson to Philly for Okafor because Okafor does not fit in D'Antonio's system and Clarkson would perfectly. If Clarkson for Okafor doesn't work out then what? Or should we stick with what we have?

1.) 17 Jan 2016
17 Jan 2016 07:27:03
Include Randle who's a ball dominant forward with no right hand, gets out of control, and tries to face up on smaller guards when he can easily use the "strength" all the lakers players have been raving about and post up. Okafor would be a great fit with the lakers to have an inside outside game.

2.) 18 Jan 2016
18 Jan 2016 03:21:26
I agree with getting Okafor but I wouldn't trade Carlson I'd trade Hibberd strait up for Okafor
Reasons why
1. Hibberd isn't that much of a center and will work better in dantonis system
2. Okafor isn't happy in Philadelphia and in his heart he wants to be a laker I blame bitch cumtain for that
3. This is left field but I'm going to say it anyway mike dantoni is the worst coach of all time he's the reason Kobe got hurt when he was coaching you don't let a player up in age to play 4 full games strait with age you become more prone to injuries
4. Byron Scott I would see his layout is good there's just no execution in the team

3.) 19 Jan 2016
19 Jan 2016 20:03:49
why would the sixers give up okafor for just hibbert??

4.) 21 Jan 2016
21 Jan 2016 00:36:49
Hibb stinks and he's a free agent nobody's giving up nothing for him if Mitch pulls that off he's the greatest. Gm ever