Lakers Rumors Member Posts

 

yravid's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded


yravid's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To yravid's Posts

 

 

To yravid's last 5 rumours posts

 

To yravid's last 5 rumour replies

 

yravid's rumours posts with other poster's replies to yravid's rumours posts

 

19 Jul 2015 16:44:40
Lakers/Sac/Nuggets

Lakers:
cousins + collison
Sacramento:
faried + lawson
Nuggets:
Hibbert + Young + Kelly

Lakers:
get cousins and the contract of collison,
this is what they need, get rid of Kelly & Young, makeing room for the young guys and putting themselves in a position to win

Nuggets:
Getting rid of lawson, trading faried, start rebuilding and clearing cup space for the next season when Hibbert is free agent.

Sacramento:
Karl get what he wanted, getting rid of both cousins & collison and getting back is core nuggets team, this time in Sacramento.

yravid

1.) 19 Jul 2015 20:02:17
You got 2 problems. First the salaries don't match. Your $4 million short going out of Sacramento compared to coming in so the Kings would have to add a player like McLemore. Second the Kings can get a better offer than what you have going. If I am Mitch for the Lakers. Sign me up on this deal, lol.


2.) 19 Jul 2015 20:14:43
I'm a Boogie fan, but Hibbert is what the Lakers need right now even more than LA and KLove, because Hibbert is a defensive player where as LA, BOOGIE and KLOVE are primarily offensive players and would constantly demand the ball in their hands, but we already have plenty of scorers. If the Lakers trade Hibbert for Boogie that's totally fine, but its very unlikely; we have to see how the season goes maybe it could be possible in February.


3.) 19 Jul 2015 21:25:35
In the ESPN trade machine this one works.


 

 

 

yravid has no Banter Posts

 

 

yravid's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

26 Jul 2015 12:24:00
did they sign upshaw?

yravid

 

 

Click To View This Thread

19 Jul 2015 21:25:35
In the ESPN trade machine this one works.

yravid

 

 

 

yravid has no Banter Replies